USPTO serial 76213928
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Don Mills, Ontario M3B 3K9, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES, CASSETTES AND DISKS FEATURING WORKS OF FICTION; VIDEO, DOWNLOADABLE AND NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR CREATING AND PRINTING CALENDARS, INVITATIONS, RESUMES AND PARTY PLANNERS; OPTICAL DISKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY A SERIES OF FICTION BOOKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING BOOKS, VIDEO RECORDING AND AUDIO RECORDINGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING ON-LINE ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARDS AND ON-LINE COMMUNITIES FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS ABOUT BOOKS AND A RANGE OF TOPICS RELATED TO WOMEN AND WOMEN'S ISSUES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |