USPTO serial 76214062
SUPPORT PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPPORT PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas L. Jones
DOUGLAS L JONES MAHONEY HAWKES LLP75 PARK PLZBOSTON, MA 02116-3934UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | medicated foot care preparations | ACTIVE | Mar 27, 1988 |
| 010 | Mobility aids, namely, support stockings, dressing aids, abdominal and back supports, incotient protectors, insoles, mobile reading stands, walkers, travel chairs | ACTIVE | Mar 27, 1988 |
| 025 | Footwear, hosiery and undergarments | ACTIVE | Mar 27, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |