USPTO serial 76214161
HAMMERTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAMMERTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail and wholesale services by direct solicitation by sales agents, mail order and catalog services, and computerized on-line services, all featuring lighting, furnishings and accessories | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1999 |
| 040 | Manufacture of lighting, furnishings and accessories therefor to order and/or specification of others | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |