USPTO serial 76214316
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HENDERSON, NV
HENDERSON, NV
Beverly Hills, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, footwear, shoes, hats, caps, shirts, and jackets | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |