Drawing for VWR BIOMARKE THE MARKET SOURCE FOR LIFESCIENCE

USPTO serial 76214473

VWR BIOMARKE THE MARKET SOURCE FOR LIFESCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VWR BIOMARKE THE MARKET SOURCE FOR LIFESCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Lehane

WILLIAM J LEHANE LOGANDRINKER BIDDLE AND REATH1 LOGAN SQ FL 18PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6996

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016publications, namely, a magazine, in the field of life sciences for use by professionalsACTIVEDec 31, 1999
035on-line store and catalog sale services all featuring products for use un life science laboratoriesACTIVEDec 31, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 7, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 7, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 6, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 8, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance