Drawing for CYBERSLOTZ

USPTO serial 76214681

CYBERSLOTZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBERSLOTZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, GAMES OF CHANCE, HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 19, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 12, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 12, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 29, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 28, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 6, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance