USPTO serial 76214718
CORTEX MACHINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORTEX MACHINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Artificial vision systems, namely, optical scanners used in the fields of cosmetics, health, and dentistry and in the industrial field for the purpose of object representation, appearance mapping, spectral imaging, absolute color matching, shape reconstruction and solid modeling; and computer software used in conjunction with artificial vision systems, said software being used in the fields of cosmetics, health, dentistry and in the industrial field for the purpose of object representation, appearance mapping, spectral imaging, absolute color matching, shape reconstruction and solid modeling | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |