USPTO serial 76214792
CORDAPTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORDAPTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consulting services; information technology consulting services; design of computer systems; computer code and system conversion for others; computer programming for commercial and industrial use for others; updating of computer software; computer software design for commercial and industrial use for others; consulting services, namely, providing consultation in the field of information technology, computer systems integration services; development of custom and packaged software; software implementation, maintenance and development services; technical support services, namely, providing troubleshooting in the field of computer hardware and software via telephone and global computer networks; computer services, namely, customer support and help desk services; application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications of others and providing computer software applications to others over global computer networks; management of internal and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |