Drawing for CORDAPTIX

USPTO serial 76214792

CORDAPTIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORDAPTIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R J HEHER

R J HEHER ESQ FENWICK & W LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-2008

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer consulting services; information technology consulting services; design of computer systems; computer code and system conversion for others; computer programming for commercial and industrial use for others; updating of computer software; computer software design for commercial and industrial use for others; consulting services, namely, providing consultation in the field of information technology, computer systems integration services; development of custom and packaged software; software implementation, maintenance and development services; technical support services, namely, providing troubleshooting in the field of computer hardware and software via telephone and global computer networks; computer services, namely, customer support and help desk services; application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications of others and providing computer software applications to others over global computer networks; management of internal and global computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 31, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 1, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance