USPTO serial 76214968
SOHMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOHMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GALLATIN, TN
CHICAGO, IL
SACRAMENTO, CA
SACRAMENTO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, PIANOS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAMICK MUSIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PERSIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BURGETT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BURGETT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 015
- Similar marks named SOHMER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |