Drawing for OIL LIFT

USPTO serial 76214973

OIL LIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OIL LIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TODD N HATHAWAY

TODD N HATHAWAY BELLINGHAM TOWERS BLDG STE 620119 N COMMERCIAL STBELLINGHAM, WA 98225-4437UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CLEANING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY ENVIRONMENTAL AND NON-TOXIC INDUSTRIAL CLEANERS FOR USE ON CONCRETE AND PAVED SURFACESACTIVE—
040OIL REMOVAL AND BIOREMEDIATION SERVICES, NAMELY, BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED POROUS SURFACES, NAMELY, CONCRETE AND PAVED SURFACES, AND REMOVAL OF OIL AND HYDROCARBONS FROM SURFACES, NAMELY, CONCRETE AND PAVED SURFACESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 20, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 20, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 31, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 30, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance