USPTO serial 76214973
OIL LIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OIL LIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING SCIENCE, INC.
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 2T4, CA
Other trademarks owned by ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING SCIENCE, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING SCIENCE, INC.
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 2T4, CA
Other trademarks owned by ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING SCIENCE, INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CLEANING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY ENVIRONMENTAL AND NON-TOXIC INDUSTRIAL CLEANERS FOR USE ON CONCRETE AND PAVED SURFACES | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | OIL REMOVAL AND BIOREMEDIATION SERVICES, NAMELY, BIOREMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED POROUS SURFACES, NAMELY, CONCRETE AND PAVED SURFACES, AND REMOVAL OF OIL AND HYDROCARBONS FROM SURFACES, NAMELY, CONCRETE AND PAVED SURFACES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING SCIENCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENVIRONMENTAL BUILDING SCIENCE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named OIL LIFT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |