Drawing for Serial No. 76215171

USPTO serial 76215171

Serial No. 76215171

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76215171?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Manually operated tool, namely, vehicle ball joint remover and installerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 2, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 25, 2006EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT
Feb 24, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 24, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jun 20, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 1, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 21, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 17, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 7, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 30, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jan 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 15, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2002NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED
Sep 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance