Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76215171?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76215171. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns Serial No. 76215171?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76215171, the listed owner(s) include: SPX Corporation.

What is USPTO serial number 76215171?

Serial number 76215171 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark Serial No. 76215171. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of Serial No. 76215171?

Serial No. 76215171 (76215171) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover Serial No. 76215171?

The public record lists International Classes: 008. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 76215171

Serial No. 76215171

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Feb 23, 2001
Status date: Feb 24, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76215171?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

SPX Corporation
Muskegon, MI
Other trademarks owned by SPX Corporation

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Weber

JOHN H WEBER BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLPWASHINGTON SQ1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
008	Manually operated tool, namely, vehicle ball joint remover and installer	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
May 3, 2006	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
May 2, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Apr 25, 2006	EXDM	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT	—
Feb 24, 2006	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Feb 24, 2006	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Jun 20, 2005	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
Jun 20, 2005	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jun 1, 2005	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Mar 21, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Mar 17, 2005	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jan 7, 2005	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Dec 30, 2004	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 29, 2004	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 27, 2004	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 2004	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Jan 8, 2004	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Nov 24, 2003	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 24, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 23, 2003	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2003	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
May 15, 2003	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 30, 2002	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Dec 3, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 3, 2002	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 21, 2002	NAUD	NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED	—
Sep 4, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 4, 2002	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 4, 2002	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 21, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 3, 2001	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—