USPTO serial 76215186
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Richmond Hill, Ontario, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR AUTHORING, CAPTURING, CREATING, DISTRIBUTING, EDITING, HOSTING, PROCESSING, PRODUCING, RECORDING, UPLOADING AND ON-LINE VIEWING OF DIGITAL VIDEO, DIGITAL SLIDE SHOWS AND INTERACTIVE DIGITAL PRESENTATIONS; COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR AUTHORING, NAVIGATING AND PLAYING OF DVD CONTENT; COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLED TV AND HDTV (HIGH DENSITY TELEVISION) RECORDING, EDITING AND VIEWING; COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR DVD PLAYERS, PDAS, PERSONAL VIDEO RECORDERS, SET TOP BOXES, WEB TV AND INTERNET APPLIANCES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |