USPTO serial 76215281
EQUUS NUTRITION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EQUUS NUTRITION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Baum, Esq.
John C. Baum, Esq. TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CENTER, 8TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | ANIMAL FEED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Associated Feed & Supply Co.
- Other trademarks owned by ASSOCIATED FEED & SUPPLY CO.
- Other trademarks owned by ASSOCIATED FEED & SUPPLY CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named EQUUS NUTRITION SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |