USPTO serial 76215528
LIFTPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFTPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Panorama City, CA
Panorama City, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WHEELCHAIR LIFT ACCESSORIES, NAMELY WIRED AND WIRELESS REMOTE CONTROLLERS FOR OPERATING AND CONTROLLING WHEELCHAIR LIFTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | MANUAL AND POWER-OPERATED WHEELCHAIR LIFTS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH VEHICLES; RETROFIT KITS TO MODIFY VEHICLES TO INCLUDE A WHEELCHAIR LIFT AND ACCESSORIES ON LAND VEHICLES, COMPRISED OF MANUAL AND POWER-OPERATED WHEELCHAIR LIFTS, MOUNTING BRACKETS FOR INSTALLATION OF WHEELCHAIR LIFTS, POWER UNITS FOR DRIVING WHEELCHAIR LIFTS, PLATFORMS, RAMPS, RAILS, ROLL-OVER GUARDS, CONTROL UNITS, WIRING HARNESSES, WIRED AND WIRELESS REMOTE CONTROLLERS FOR OPERATING AND CONTROLLING WHEELCHAIR LIFTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |