USPTO serial 76215620
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated machines, namely, abrasive polishers for semiconductor wafers, plasma etcher polishers for semiconductor wafers, and chemical mechanical polishers for semiconductor wafers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |