USPTO serial 76216027
INTEGRALIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2926523Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2005
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRALIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ismaning, DE
ISMANING, DE
ISMANING, DE
D-85737 Ismaning, DE
D-85737 Ismaning, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Services in connection with preventing access to computer networks by unauthorized third parties, namely, the installation of network filter lists and the installation and activation of network firewalls; installation of computer hardware; repair and maintenance of interactive networks and data processing, hardware systems; consulting services in the field of repair of networks and data processing systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Training in the field of Information Technology (IT) Security Technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Monitoring services, namely the analysis of access to computer networks; technical consultant services for the protection of networks, and the development of software and hardware therefor; development, repair, maintenance and implementation of computer programs for data processing; consulting services in the field of maintenance and operation of computer programs for data processing in the field of Information Technology Security Technology; design and operation of interactive networks and data processing systems for the transmission of data and information; consulting services in the field of operation of networks and data processing systems; services of an online provider, namely, the provision of monitoring services over the Internet and providing a computer database in the field of Information Technology Security Technology; database development and integration services; enterprise tailored analysis of concepts and needs of security in the Information Technology field; 24-hour monitoring services in the field of computer systems, namely Information Technology Security Technology; installation of intellectual computer software in the field of Information Technology security for securing of information and data against unauthorized access to and use of data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Articon-Integralis AG
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRALIS AG
- Other trademarks owned by NTT COM SECURITY AG
- Other trademarks owned by Articon-Integralis AG
- Other trademarks owned by Articon-Integralis AG
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTEGRALIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |