USPTO serial 76217183
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hereford, GB
Hereford HR2 6JR, GB
Hereford HR2 6JR, GB
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Metal kegs, containers of metal for holding liquids; manually operated metal valves, metal fluid storage tanks ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2001 |
| 007 | Machine parts, namely drum valves, plastic valves for use in chemical containers, beverage valves, and plastic valves for use in beverage containers; machine parts, namely plastic couplers for attaching filling and dispensing equipment to chemical containers by attachment to the valves; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2001 |
| 009 | [ Measuring and dispensing apparatus and equipment, namely, measuring and dosing equipment used for dosing measured quantities of liquid chemicals into drip irrigation systems; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2001 |
| 020 | Brewing apparatus and equipment, namely, pressurized plastic beverage containers and unpressurized plastic beverage containers; [ liquid handling apparatus and equipment, namely, plastic containers for transporting and storing chemicals; ] non-metal kegs; [ crates and containers of non-metal material for handling liquids; ] non-metal barrels, non-metal fluid storage tanks; non-metal containers adapted for storage and transportation of beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2001 |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of apparatus and equipment for use in the brewing and agrochemical industries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 5, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |