USPTO serial 76217266
MAXIMUM SPORT FORMULE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIMUM SPORT FORMULE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Mandel
LAWRENCE D MANDEL MANDEL & PESLAK LLC80 SCENIC DR STE 5FREEHOLD, NJ 07728UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and skin care products, namely, after shave lotions, antiperspirants, astringents for cosmetic purposes, baby oil, baby powder, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, beauty masks, body cream, body oil, body powder, cologne, essential oils for personal use, facial scrubs, massage lotion for skin, massage oil, perfume, petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving lotion, shower gel, skin clarifiers, talcum powder and toilet soap | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | antibacterial alcohol-based skin sanitizer lotion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 19TH HOLE PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by 19TH HOLE PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MAXIMUM SPORT FORMULE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |