USPTO serial 76217303
ARKIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARKIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
64000 Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Thomas S. Safford
A THOMAS S SAFFORD FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business-to-business and business-to-customer wholesale and retail store services featuring of all types of materials used in the construction and related industries particularly over the Internet, by telephone, and by print catalogs to construction professionals that include architects, engineers, contractors, and builders; invoicing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial analysis and consultation; financial transaction, namely all the following, credit consultation; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; foreign exchange, invoicing, payment processing related to the purchase of construction material; cash management, including protocols for capturing early payment discounts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultation services for building construction and repair, for engineering, and for architectural design, including providing technical assistance in the construction and related industries, consulting on the use of construction materials and construction design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |