USPTO serial 76217872
AURIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AURIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mission Viejo, CA
Mission Viejo, CA
Norwalk, CA
Norwalk, CA
Whittier, CA
Whittier, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS AND DEVICES COMPRISED OF SOUND AMPLIFIERS, ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS, AUDIO AND VIDEO ELECTRONIC SWITCHERS, ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES, AUDIO FILTERS, AUDIO EQUALIZERS, AUDIO SPEAKERS, ELECTRONIC SOUND TRANSDUCERS, COMPUTER INTERFACE BOARDS, COMPUTERS, AUDIO FREQUENCY ANALYZERS, ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR TESTING, NAMELY ARTIFICIAL NOISE GENERATORS, TEST SIGNAL INJECTORS, RESONANT OBJECT LOCATING SENSORS, PHASE CORRECTION SIGNAL INJECTORS AND GRAPHIC ROOM CHARACTERISTICS MAPPING DEVICES, AUDIO SIGNAL GENERATORS, AUDIO SPECTRUM SWEEPERS, REMOTE CONTROLS FOR THE ACTIVATION OF ALARMS, CONTROL OF AUDIO PROGRAM SELECTION, CONTENT, VOLUME AND AUDIO CONTOUR, ACTIVATION OF BUILT-IN TEST FEATURES, CONTROL OF AMPLIFIERS, AND MUSIC SOURCE DEVICES, AUDIO DISTRIBUTION CABLING SYSTEMS, ATTENUATORS, STEREO TUNERS, ANALOG AND DIGITAL TAPE PLAYERS AND RECORDERS, INTERNET INTERFACES, NAMELY BRIDGES, ROUTERS, MUXES, MULTIPLEXERS AND IMPEDANCE MATCHING ADAPTORS, SATELLITE INTERFACES, NAMELY SATELLITE RECEIVERS AND TRANSMITTERS FOR SENDING AND RECEIVING PROGRAM CONTENT AND OPERATIONAL COMMANDS VIA SATELLITE, AUDIO MATRICIES, NAMELY ROUTERS, MUXES, SWITCHERS, MULTIPLEXERS, PATCH PANELS AND SWITCHING PANEL ARRAYS, MODEMS, COMPUTER SOUND CARDS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, AUTOMATIC ELECTRICAL CONTROLS, NAMELY TIMERS, POWER SUPPLIES, SWITCHING RELAYS, SIGNAL ROUTERS, POWER FAILURE OR FAULT SENSING SWITCHING DEVICES, AND MICROPROCESSORS FOR USE IN THE FORMATTING, REPRODUCTION AND TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO AND VIDEO DATA, NAMELY FOR THE FORMATTING, REPRODUCTION AND TRANSMISSION OF MUSIC, PAGING AND VIDEO DATA | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Durban, Jack
- Other trademarks owned by Durban, Jack
- Other trademarks owned by Rios, Ronald
- Other trademarks owned by Rios, Ronald
- Other trademarks owned by Ibey, Jerry A.
- Other trademarks owned by Ibey, Jerry A.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named AURIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |