USPTO serial 76217934
INNOVANCE NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNOVANCE NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Piscataway, NJ
Piscataway, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical networking equipment, namely, optical terminal nodes consisting of dense wavelength division multiplexing transponders, optical multiplexers and demultiplexers, optical amplifiers, optical switches, variable optical attentuators, and fixed and tunable dispersion compensators; optical amplifier nodes consisting of optical amplifiers, variable optical attentuators, and dispersion compensators; optical add/drop nodes consisting of dense wavelength division multiplexing transponders, optical multiplexers and demultiplexers, optical amplifiers, optical switches, variable optical attentuators, and dispersion compensators; embedded optical networking interfaces consisting of tunable lasers, electronic multiplexers, optical modulators and optical receivers; and remote optical terminals consisting of dense wavelength division multiplexing transponders, optical multiplexers and demultiplexers, optical amplifiers, optical switches, variable optical attentuators, and fixed and tunable dispersion compensators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |