USPTO serial 76218315
TRITON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRITON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
72124 Pliezhausen, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for manufacturing semiconductor substrates, silicon chips, wafers, liquid crystal display substrates, liquid crystal displays, semiconductor chips and solar cells; machines for drying, cleaning or etching silicon wafers for use in the in the manufacture of semiconductor chips; wet processing machines for use manufacture of semiconductor chips and wet processing machines for oxidation by diluted hydrofluoric acid and for particle removal in an ammonia and hydrogen peroxide acid bath, all for use on semiconductor substrates and wafers, silicon wafers, liquid crystal display substrates, liquid crystal displays, solar cells; and machine parts, namely, drying units using nitrogen, alcohol vapors or mixtures thereof for use on semiconductor substrates and wafers, silicon wafers, liquid crystal display substrates, liquid crystal displays, and solar cells | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Drying and wet processing units for the treatment of semiconductor substrates, silicon chips, wafers, liquid crystal substrates, liquid crystal displays, semiconductor wafers and solar cells as well as their surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and servicing of the following machines and units, machines for manufacturing semiconductor substrates, silicon chips, wafers, liquid crystal display substrates, liquid crystal displays, semiconductor chips, and/or solar cells, machines for drying, cleaning and/or etching silicon wafers for use in the manufacture of semiconductor chips; wet processing machines for use in the manufacture of semiconductor chips and wet processing machines for oxidation by diluted hydrofluoric and hydrochloric acid and for particle removal in an ammonia and hydrogen peroxide acid bath, all for use on semiconductor substrates and wafers, silicon wafers, liquid crystal display substrates, liquid crystal displays, solar cells; and drying units using nitrogen, alcohol vapors and/or mixtures thereof for use on semiconductor substrates and wafers, silicon wafers, liquid crystal display substrates, liquid crystal displays, solar cells, as machine parts; drying and wet processing units for the treatment of semiconductor substrates, silicon chips wafers, liquid crystal displays, semiconductor wafers and solar cells as well as their surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |