USPTO serial 76218466
CAMBRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAMBRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELISABETH A. LANGWORTHY
ELISABETH A LANGWORTHY SUTHERLAND, ASBILL & BRENNAN, LLP1275 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2415UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | carpet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 20, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |