USPTO serial 76218513
INNOVATIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INNOVATIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | BROKERAGE IN THE FIELD OF OFF-FLEET VEHICLES | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |