Drawing for CERAMEXT

USPTO serial 76218527

CERAMEXT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3051271Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CERAMEXT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP2300 N ST., N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007hot vacuum press for extrusionSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 17, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 4, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 4, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 19, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 6, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 4, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 4, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 28, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 30, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 27, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance