USPTO serial 76218637
SCHWARTZ'S WORLD FAMOUS MONTREAL SMOKED MEAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHWARTZ'S WORLD FAMOUS MONTREAL SMOKED MEAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEATS AND PROCESSED MEATS, NAMELY, BACON, SAUSAGE, BOLOGNA, SALAMI, PASTRAMI, CORNED BEEF, BRISKET, TONGUE, PEPPERONI, FRANKFURTERS, KIELBASA, KNOCKWURST, PATE, ROAST BEEF, LAMB, HAM, PORK TURKEY, CHICKEN, CORNISH HEN, CHICKEN LIVER, EDIBLE CHICKEN FAT RENDERED AND UNRENDERED, DUCK AND LUNCHEON MEATS; PROCESSED ANCHOVIES, FISH FILLETS, SEAFOOD, SARDINES, SMOKED SALMON AND LOX; PROCESSED FRUITS, VEGETABLES AND POTATOES; PROCESSED NUTS, NAMELY, ALMONDS, CASHEWS, MACADAMIAS, PISTACHIOS, HAZELNUTS, WALNUTS, PECANS AND PEANUTS; PICKLES, EDIBLE OILS; PROCESSED OLIVES; PROCESSED PIMENTOS; SAUERKRAUT; CHEESE, CHEESE SPREADS, PROCESSED ROLLED CHEESE; SNACK DIPS, EXCLUDING SALSA AND OTHER SAUCES USED AS DIPS; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PROCESSED FRUITS, PROCESSED NUTS AND/OR RAISINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PROCESSED CONDIMENTS, NAMELY, MUSTARD, KETCHUP, MAYONNAISE, PICKLE RELISH, PIMENTOS; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CRACKERS, PRETZELS, CANDIED NUTS AND/OR POPPED POPCORN | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MONTREAL HEWBREW DELICATESSEN (INT'L) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MONTREAL HEWBREW DELICATESSEN (INT'L) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Welik, Ralph
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SCHWARTZ'S WORLD FAMOUS MONTREAL SMOKED MEAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |