USPTO serial 76219233
FOR CEOS ONLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOR CEOS ONLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montgomeryville, PA
MONTGOMERYVILLE, PA
Aspen, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | VENTURE CAPITAL FUNDING, INVESTMENT BANKING AND MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENT SERVICES, PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL RESEARCH, AND EXPRESSLY EXCLUDING HEALTH BENEFITS SERVICES, ALL OFFERED TO SENOR CORPORATE EXECUTIVE MEMBERS OF AN ORGANIZATION SPONSORED BY APPLICANT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF INVESTMENT IN EMERGING COMPANIES AND THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF COMPANIES, AND EXPRESSLY EXCLUDING THE FIELD OF HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAMS, OFFERED TO SENIOR CORPORATE EXECUTIVE MEMBERS OF AN ORGANIZATION SPONSORED BY APPLICANT; LEISURE AND RECREATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY ARRANGING AND PROVIDING MEMBERSHIP IN PRIVATE GOLF AND RECREATIONAL SPORTS CLUBS FOR SENIOR CORPORATE EXECUTIVE MEMBERS OF AN ORGANIZATION SPONSORED BY APPLICANT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CEOonly.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FOR CEOS ONLY.INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FOR CEOS ONLY.INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named FOR CEOS ONLY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |