USPTO serial 76219368
CELLMAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELLMAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TEL AVIV, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | accessories for games, namely, joysticks for video games; interactive electronic video games and interactive television games for virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and/or software; home video game machines for use with televisions | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 028 | games and playthings, namely, action-type target games, arcade games, paddle ball games, card games, pinball games, bathtub toys, electronic dart games, dolls, balloons, battery operated mechanical toys, stand-alone video game machines; gymnastic apparatus, gymnastic parallel bars, vaulting horses and training stools and parts and fittings therefor; sporting articles and apparatus, namely, chest protectors for sports, and pumps for inflating sports equipment, such as basketballs, footballs, and parts and fittings therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |