USPTO serial 76219902
POINT BIOMEDICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POINT BIOMEDICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing and advertising services for the goods of others, namely, biodegradable polymers designed to function as a diagnostic contrast agent and as an adjuvant and which deliver a variety of drugs and diagnostic agents to specific sites in the body; technology licensing services in the fields of diagnostic imaging, therapy and in vivo drug delivery | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |