Drawing for NETENTERPRISE

USPTO serial 76219917

NETENTERPRISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETENTERPRISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, connecting customer web sites and web applications for online access by users through the Internet, hosting and managing customer web sites and web applications at data centers, providing network management and support services to customersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 20, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 21, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 20, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 4, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 4, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Oct 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 7, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Mar 25, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Mar 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jan 14, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 14, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 20, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance