USPTO serial 76220177
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board, The
Englewood, CO
Other trademarks owned by Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board, The
Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board, The
Englewood, CO
Other trademarks owned by Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board, The
National Cattlemen's Beef Association
Englewood, CO
Other trademarks owned by National Cattlemen's Beef Association
National Cattlemen's Beef Association
Englewood, CO
Other trademarks owned by National Cattlemen's Beef Association
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed foods, namely a deep fried breaded cheeseburger appetizer | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |