USPTO serial 76220431
UNIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Jose, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software platforms, computer software, and downloadable computer software, all for use in providing broadband services, namely, the electronic transmission of data, voice, and video via a global computer network; computer software platforms, computer software, and downloadable computer software, all for streaming media applications, namely, the electronic transmission of data, voice, and video via a global computer network; computer software platforms, computer software, and downloadable computer software, all for creating and editing multimedia contents; computer software platforms, computer software, and downloadable computer software, all for online multimedia communications, namely, connecting global computer networks; computer software platforms, computer software, and downloadable computer software, all for use as a search engine; all in the field of computer communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in providing broadband services, namely, the electronic transmission of data, voice, and video via a global computer network; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for streaming media applications, namely, the electronic transmission of data, voice, and video via a global computer network; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for creating and editing multimedia contents; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for online multimedia communications, namely, connecting global computer networks; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable search engine software; all in the field of computer communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |