USPTO serial 76220559
WEPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | reading glasses, corrective eyeglass lenses; contact lenses, cases for contact lenses; eyeglasses for use with computers; optical glass used to make eyeglass lenses; optical lenses; safety goggles, namely, protective glasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; horological apparatus and instrument, namely, clocks; chronometrical instruments, namely, chronometers; watches; watch cases; watchbands; watch glass sold as a component part of watches, wristwatches | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAB SPORTS SA
- Other trademarks owned by BAB SPORTS SA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WEPS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |