USPTO serial 76220788
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Matthews, NC
Matthews, NC
Matthews, NC
MATTHEWS, NC
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed foods, namely, frozen vegetables, cooking oil, processed vegetables in the nature of water chestnuts, bean sprouts, and bamboo shoots; processed nuts; processed vegetables; soups; fruit preserves; marmalades; coconut milk | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 27, 2004 |
| 030 | Staple foods, namely, frozen confections, cakes, pies, ice creams, sorbet, dipping sauces, salsa, packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta and rice, rice mixes, sauces, marinades, maple syrup, vegetable crackers, wheat crackers, toasted sesame crackers, cracked pepper crackers, tea, cookies, curries, coffee, coffee beans | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 12, 2003 |
| 031 | Unprocessed natural agricultural products, namely, nuts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 14, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 17, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 18, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |