USPTO serial 76220935
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Concord, Ontario, L4K 4Z3, CA
Concord, Ontario, L4K 4Z3, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Encoding of magnetic stripe credit cards and smart cards; manufacture of magnetic strip credit cards and smart cards to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development of new technology for others in the field of magnetic stripe credit cards and smart cards | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |