USPTO serial 76221046
VISIONMEGANE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIONMEGANE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized on-line retail store services for ordering and purchasing eyeglasses and contact lenses over global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing information in the field of ophthalmology relating to eyesight testing, vision assessment, contact lenses, providing a customer with virtual eyeglass fitting by means of transmitting an image of a customer's face with a matched and fitted assortment of frames based on a customer's submitted preferences, and eyeglass selection consultation, via websites on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VISION OPTIC CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VISION OPTIC CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VISIONMEGANE.COM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |