USPTO serial 76222142
ARROWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARROWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane Donnelly
DIANE DONNELLY VON MALTITZ, DERENBERGSTKUNIN JANSSEN & GIORDANO 60 E 42ND SNEW YORK, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | BOARD GAMES, JIGSAWS, CARD GAMES, DOLLS, TOY ACTION FIGURES, HAND-HELD ELECTRONIC GAMES, ALL RELATING TO MOTOR SPORT; MODEL CARS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING TRAINING IN THE USE OF MOTOR RACE CARS; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES ,NAMELY, SPONSORING AND ORGANIZING MOTOR CAR RACES, AND PARTICIPATION IN MOTOR CAR RACES BY OPERATING CAR RACING TEAMS; ORGANIZING COMMUNITY SPORTING AND CULTURAL EVENTS; PROVIDING MOTOR SPORTS INFORMATION BY MEANS OF TELEVISION, INTERNET, FILM AT CINEMA THEATERS, CABLE TELEVISION AND OTHER FORMS OF DIGITAL AND ELECTRONIC DISTRIBUTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arrows Grand Prix International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Arrows Grand Prix International Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ARROWS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |