USPTO serial 76222805
CONNECTME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONNECTME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EXBAND (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
EAST MARREDPALLY, SECUNDERABAD, IN
Independent Living Solutions, Inc.
San Rafael, CA
Other trademarks owned by Independent Living Solutions, Inc.
Independent Living Solutions, Inc.
Richardson, TX
Other trademarks owned by Independent Living Solutions, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
KENNETH C JOHNSTON KANE RUSSELL COLEMAN & LOGAN PC1601 ELM ST 3700 THANKSGIVING TWRDALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer keyboards; remote controls for television; computer e-mail programs; and video cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EXBAND (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Living Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Living Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CONNECTME
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |