USPTO serial 76224118
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
74172 Neckarsulm, DE
74172 Neckarsulm, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria C.H. Lin
DOCKET DEPT MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SPICES, SPICE PREPARATIONS, SPICE FLAVORS, SPICE ESSENCES, SPICE EXTRACTS, SPICE HERBS, SPICE OILS FOR FOOD, SPICE SALTS, SPICE SAUCES, SEASONINGS, SEASONING FLAVORS AND SEASONING PREPARATIONS, SOUP SEASONINGS AND FLAVORS, PEPPER, COMMON SALT, KETCHUP, SAUCES, INCLUDING SALAD DRESSING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |