USPTO serial 76229776
GETTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GETTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIET E PERKINS
HARRIET E PERKINS DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP18TH & CHERRY STSONE LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Intent to Use) Anti-freeze and summer coolant; chemicals used in the automotive and gasoline industries, namely, aromatics; brake fluid; paraffin solvents; automobile cooling system rust inhibitors; chemical fuel and oil additives for motor vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
| 004 | (Based on Intent to Use) Propane gas, lighter fluid, kerosene, fuel oil, lubricating oils, lubricating greases for use with vehicles, diesel fuel, jet fuel, gasoline, water pump lubricant, automatic transmission fluid, valve lube fluid, household fuel oil, industrial lubricating oil, cutting oil for industrial metal working, and transformer oil | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Automobile service station services | ABANDONED | Sep 10, 1969 |
| 039 | (Based on Intent to Use) Transportation services for refinery products by rail, truck and water and terminal storage services for refinery products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GETTY TM CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by GETTY TM CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named GETTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2007 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |