Drawing for GOLDEN KERNEL

USPTO serial 76230038

GOLDEN KERNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN KERNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Titley

ROBERT L TITLEY QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 2550MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4497UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029shelled, roasted and processed nuts, dried fruits, dried seeds, mixtures of shelled nuts and dried fruits, mixtures of shelled nuts, dried fruits and dried seeds, trail mixes, potato chipsACTIVE
030candy, popped popcorn, caramel-coated and cheese-coated popcorn, tortilla chips, corn chips, rye chips, rice-based and wheat-based snack foods, bread sticks, pretzels, cheese flavored crackers and bread sticks, shoestring potatoes, honey roasted peanutsACTIVE
031raw nutsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance