USPTO serial 76230207
ULTRASIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRASIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brecksville, OH
Brecksville, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank C. Rote, Jr.
HELEN A ODAR BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical preparations for use in the manufacture of personal care products, namely dimethicone copolyol, dimethicone copolyol laurate, dimethicone copolyol isostearate, dimethicone copolyol avocadoate, dimethicone copolyol olivate, dimethicone copolyol beeswax, dimethiconol stearate, dimethiconol hydroxystearate, dimethiconol fluoro alcohol dilinoleic acid, dimethicone copolyolamine, dimethone copolyol phthalate, silicone quaternlum-8 and dimethicone | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |