USPTO serial 76230232
JOURNEYMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOURNEYMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Mundt
DAVID M MUNDT COOK ALEX MCFARRON MANZO CUMMINGS ET AL200 W ADAMS ST STE 2850CHICAGO, IL 60606-5206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | hand tools, namely pliers and cable cutters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |