Drawing for BACK TO SCHOOL

USPTO serial 76231997

BACK TO SCHOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACK TO SCHOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

S. Roxanne Edwards

Diane K. Lettelleir Tandy Brands Accessories, Inc.690 E. Lamar, Ste. 200Attn: Martie RockeyArlington, TX 76011

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018LEATHER GOODS, NAMELY, BILLFOLDS, WALLETS, CREDIT CARD CASES, PURSES, HANDBAGS, TRAVELING BAGS, MINI-HANDBAGS, BELT BAGS, AND KEY CASESACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, BELTS, HATS, SCARVES, SHOES, SUSPENDERS, AND TIESACTIVE—
026HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HAIR BANDS, HAIR BOWS, HAIR BUCKLES, HAIR ORNAMENTS, AND HAIR RIBBONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 5, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 21, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 7, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance