USPTO serial 76233951
VISION.360
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISION.360?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BURBANK, CA
BURBANK, CA
Hollywood, CA
HOLLYWOOD, CA
HOLLYWOOD, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C. Liu
WEN LIU LIU & LIU444 S FLOWER ST STE 1750LOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Film and video editing, namely, digital editing; Audio recording and production, namely, digitally editing and creating audio, sound effects, voice recordings for integration with film and video and sound mixing and mastering; Foreign language dubbing services; Postproduction services for videotape production; High-definition television (HDTV) mastering; Distribution of radio programs for others; Distribution of television programs for others; Distribution of television programming to cable television systems; Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion pictures, documentaries, music videos, radio and television programs, and cable television programs, and providing content, namely, movies, videos, graphics, animation and multimedia presentations and on-line video games, viewable over computer networks and global communication networks; Distribution of syndicated television and radio programming; Distribution of motion pictures, movie trailers; Distribution of electronic press kits for others; Training services in the field of video and audio post-production and distribution; Closed captioning of films and videos; Entertainment services, namely, integrating video and audio on DVD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW 360
- Other trademarks owned by POINT 360
- Other trademarks owned by VDI MultiMedia Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by POINT.360, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POINT.360, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VISION.360
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |