USPTO serial 76237101
ROLLS-ROYCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLLS-ROYCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, SW1E 6AT, GB
London, SW1E 6AT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruth L. Lansner
RUTH L LANSNER HOLLAND AND KNIGHT, LLP195 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Vehicles and apparatus for locomotion by land (other than automobiles), sea and air, namely trucks, sport utility vehicles, airplanes and boats and structural parts therefor; engines for such land vehicles; parts for such land vehicles, namely axles and journals, hubs and hub bands, clutches, vehicle doors; driving motors other than internal combustion engines for such land vehicles; free wheel devices for such land vehicles, namely, wheel hubs, wheel covers and wheel rims; gear boxes for such land vehicles; electric motors for such land vehicles; engine mountings for such land vehicles; vehicle parts, namely, windows, windshield wipers, drive parts for such land vehicles, namely drive belts and drive gears, and mud guards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |