USPTO serial 76237202
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MICRO FOCUS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
GRAND CAYMAN, KY
MICRO FOCUS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
GRAND CAYMAN, KY
Newbury, GB
GRAND CAYMAN, KY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda G. Henry
LINDA G HENRY FENWICK & W LLP2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306-2122UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation regarding business opportunities and strategies in electronic commerce; business consultation services, namely, advising enterprises regarding the development of business models for use in an electronic environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting training classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the field of business opportunities and strategies in electronic commerce; educational services, namely conducting training classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops featuring the development of business models for use in an electronic environment; computer education training in the transformation, adaptation and use of existing software application programs for use on web sites and in electronic commerce and use of computer software, and use, configuration and implementation of local area and other computer communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer consultation services, namely, consulting regarding the transformation, adaptation and use of existing software application programs for use on web sites and in electronic commerce; computer web site design services; computer consultation services, namely, consulting regarding use of computer software, consulting regarding use, configuration and implementation of local area and other computer and communications networks; software compatibility testing services; software development services, namely the design and maintenance of computer software for others, software development implementation services, and computer programming services; computer consultation services, namely consulting regarding configuration, installation, implementation, and transformation of computer systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |