Drawing for AMERICAN CLIPPER

USPTO serial 76238377

AMERICAN CLIPPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN CLIPPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Garred

MARK B GARRED STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE, STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Recreational vehicles, namely motor homesACTIVESep 12, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 3, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 3, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jul 16, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
May 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 24, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 17, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 15, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance