USPTO serial 76238886
BINEXIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALL, MICHAEL E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BINEXIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey Hallerman
STACEY HALLERMAN PHR/US/BINEXISPFIZER INC150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Central nervous system diseases and disorders, neurological disorders, urological disorders, urinary disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, allergies, diabetes, hypertension, erectile dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, stroke, cancer, migraines, pain, obesity, inflammation and inflammatory diseases, respiratory and infectious diseases, and immunological, bacterial, viral and fungal disorders; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, cholesterol preparations, smoking cessation preparations, tissue and skin repair preparations, dermatological preparations, and gynecological preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |