USPTO serial 76239391
TECHCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2012
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TECHCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Techcom Software Solutions Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Techcom Software Solutions Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Techcom Software Solutions Inc.
Woodbridge, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan T. Harris
Nathan T. Harris Lando & Anastasi, LLP60 State Street, 23rd FloorBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Licensing of insurance tracking software; licensing of document imaging system; licensing of point-of-sale computer systems; licensing of property management software; licensing of real estate management software; licensing of client locate software; licensing of client cure software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Techcom Software Solutions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Techcom Software Solutions Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Techcom Software Solutions Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TECHCOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 29, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 17, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 29, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2012 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |